Fixing the Dradis Logo

As a designer, sometimes there are small details that bother me to the point where I need to address them. This time it was the Dradis logo that fell victim to my designer eye for details. A little while ago, I noticed something was amiss with the logo’s 3D perspective. When we started using the logo as the favicon, I noticed that one side appeared to be significantly narrower than the other.

Favicon with asymmetric logo

Additionally, the logo’s current style doesn’t scale well. When the logo is significantly scaled-down we lose the outlines which cause the extruded sides to blend into the top face, skewing the design.

Let’s dissect the logo to investigate and fix the perspective and symmetry problems. While we’re at it, let’s also address the scaling issue.

Investigation

Jumping right into it, let’s take a look at the current logo:

Current Dradis logo

In order to get a better understanding of what is going on with the symmetry, let’s get rid of the ring and isolate just the face of the “A”:

Isolated face of the “A”

Next, let’s add some guides for alignment and straighten it out so we can see if the top and bottom are level:

Straightened “A” with alignment guides

It is already evident that the top of the “A” isn’t quite level. Let’s zoom in to see how askew it really is:

Top alignment with the guide

That’s pretty significant if we are going to be using this for a 3D object. Let’s remember this for later when we look at the X-axis perspective.

Now let’s check out the bottom of the “A”:

Bottom right alignment with the guide

The bottom right looks spot on.

How about the bottom left?

Bottom left alignment with the guide

It’s slightly off but it’s minimal (you might have to click the above image to enlarge it in order to see the misalignment).

Now let’s fill in the missing sections to restore the original shape of the “A” before it was cut out by the ring.

Completed “A” shape

Looking at the A in this state reveals that it’s quite inconsistent. Let’s use Adobe Illustrator’s trusty measure tool to take some measurements:

“A” with measurements added

Look at it! Just look at it! 😭

All of these measurements should be the same. Let’s keep this in mind for later when we talk about the Y-axis perspective.

Additionally, let’s check the inner bottom angles of the “A”:

Inner bottom angles

Oh boy, these angles being uneven means the top of the “A” is off-center and lopsided as if the top was pushed towards the right:

“A” with center guide

In order to fix the symmetry of this shape, we’ll need to make the measurements isometric and equal out those bottom angles. But for now, let’s take a peek at the 3D perspective problems.

This is the logo again reset to its original state:

Original logo

Looking closely it’s evident that the 3D extrusion is not realistic nor consistent. Let’s dive in deeper, I’ll try to illustrate what I’m talking about.

First, let’s start with the X-axis. I’ve added some gridlines that the top and bottom edges of the A should line up with:

X-axis gridlines

We can already start to see some problems here. Going back to those alignment issues we discovered above, we can see how that top edge not being level is affecting the alignment of the shape with the X-axis gridline.

Arrows showing problem areas

The bottom left of the “A” was only slightly off level but now it’s clear how that minor misalignment also caused an issue with the 3D extrusion.

Let’s move on to the Y-axis:

Y-axis gridlines

Similar to the X-axis, we can see some issues here with the Y-axis:

Arrows showing problem areas

The “A” should be aligned to these gridlines but it’s not as a result of those uneven measurements and angles we discovered earlier. 

Finally, let’s take a gander at the z-axis:

Z-axis gridlines

😲 – shocked
🤯 – mindblown
😭 – crying

This is all wrong. Let me explain:

Arrows showing problem areas

The extrusion of the left leg’s base doesn’t make sense with how it’s skewed in. The right leg of the “A” appears to be bent down from the left leg along the Y-axis causing a huge deviation from the Z-axis gridlines. This is the main reason for the “3D-ness” not looking realistic.

Fixing

I took some time to recreate the Dradis logo using Adobe Illustrator. I corrected all the perspective and symmetry issues with the current logo design by making those uneven measurements and angles equal.

Then I used Illustrator’s 3D tools to make the 3D extrusion and adjust the perspective angle.

3D extrusion and angle adjustment

I was also able to solve the scaling issue by removing the outlines from the logo and adding shaded colors to the extrusion.

From outlines to shaded colors

Additionally, I ensured the ring was aligned to the same perspective angle as the “A” to make it look and feel right as one cohesive logo with 2 distinct elements.

The keen observer may say “but the new logo doesn’t align with the Z-axis described above!”:

Updated logo with old Z-axis gridlines

And they would be right! I like the perspective where we see the flying A’s extrusion on the inner parts of the legs. If we wanted to correct the logo using the original Z-axis angle we would end up with this perspective:

New A on the original Z-axis angle

I ended up changing the Z-axis angle to maintain the previous perspective:

Updated A on the corrected Z-axis angle 

Here is the logo again showing the adjusted Z-axis angle:

New Z-axis gridlines

And to be thorough – here are the X and Y gridlines showing how the updated logo is nice and tidy.

The below shows a comparison of the previous and updated logo designs.

Left: Original logo
Center: Updated logo with corrected perspective 
Right: Updated logo with shaded extrusion

Artboards

Finally, here is the before and after of the favicon.

Left: Before, After: Right

Now, the designer in me can rest easy knowing the logo has a realistic 3D extrusion and perfect symmetry.


Hands on Hacking

The team over at Hacker House has recently released their first book, Hands on Hacking. The book is an incredibly accessible guide for learning pentesting and purple teaming and includes often-overlooked subjects like building a business case for hacking, ethical guidelines, and report writing. 

Report writing, you say?

Needless to say, when authors Matthew Hickey and Jennifer Arcuri reached out to let us know they were featuring Dradis in the chapter on reporting, we were delighted. Since the book’s release, I’ve been able to chat with Matthew to ask about writing this book, his start in hacking and growing a career in the industry, and his favorite reads. 

You can read the full interview with Matthew Hickey at the Dradis Academy.

Hands on Hacking takes a holistic approach to hacking appropriate for those just getting started as well as for management and sysadmins wanting a deeper understanding of the attacks their organization and systems face. 

Want to win a copy of Hands on Hacking?

The team over at Wiley sent us a few copies to giveaway. To enter, share your email address with us below. Winners will be selected at random on October 9, 2020 and contacted at the email address provided to collect shipping information.

The contest is now over, thanks for entering!

New in Dradis Pro v3.9

Dradis Framework is a collaboration and reporting tool for information security teams to manage and deliver the results of security assessments, in less time and with less frustration than manual methods.

MS Word Filters – OR, NOT

Filtering content using OR and NOT hasn’t been possible until now! Now you can add OR and NOT operators to create a dizzying amount of control for your report output. As always, you can string together multiple filters to get the results you want to populate your report.

Imagine That!

We’ve added the ability to upload an image anywhere the editing toolbar appears. Dragging and dropping into the editing area works too, saving you a few steps to add images in your project to show evidence, support your statement, or even add a meme to your comment.

Even More Validation

Meme of cartoon shouting validate all the things

Validating your project before generating it has long been available as a good step to preventing some of the most common report errors. Now, view additional validation in summary views and a panel to help avoid those errors as you are working with report content to catch problems early.

For an at-a-glance way to see what needs a bit more work, the issues and evidence tables include a column showing if that item contains the correct information.

Looks like something needs to be modified…

Issues, evidence, and content blocks now have a validation panel that will highlight problems as you work.

That missing vector could cause problems, glad we caught it now!

Release Notes

  • Add a validation panel for Issues, Evidence, and Content Blocks
  • Add a validation column for Issues and Evidence table
  • Auto upload attachments and screenshots without requiring the use of the staging area
  • Cards, Evidence, Issues, and Notes now have their own attachment support
  • Displays a notification badge in the browser tab when there are unread notifications
  • Editor: Allow drag & drop, copy & paste, and direct image uploading
  • Increase the node properties column size by changing it to LONGTEXT
  • Layout: Breadcrumbs have a fixed position
  • Upload Manager: better validation
  • Bugs fixed:
    • Live filtering of templates (methodologies, notes & projects) via sidebar
    • Use absolute send times in notification emails instead of relative
  • Reporting enhancements:
    • Excel: Fix report generation exceeding the maximum cell limit
    • Word: Add NOT and OR operation for filtering content control
    • Word: Allow non-English localization documents to be exported

Designing & Developing Tylium

On March 2nd, 2020, we released Tylium, a new layout for Dradis projects replacing the long-lived Snowcrash layout. Let’s go into some of the details of the work that went into designing Tylium.

Dashboard view of the new Tylium layout

I’m Matt Budz, the product designer for Dradis, I help create new Dradis features and re-design some of the older ones that need some TLC.

First, let’s start with some background. Snowcrash has been the layout for Dradis projects since 2013. Some users may remember way back when it was released as part of v1.9. It was a shiny new UI built using the now-ancient Bootstrap 2 with a handful of 3rd-party plugin stylesheets sprinkled on top. Many new features were added over the years, but the look and feel of the app became dated.

Dashboard view of the old Snowcrash layout

My goal was to make the app look more modern and to update it to Bootstrap 4. But what does more modern entail?

I wanted to retain the long-used brand colors for both Dradis CE and Pro editions and adjust the remaining color palette to improve color contrast while ensuring the changes wouldn’t be too jarring for existing users.
Increasing on-screen real-estate was a priority during the redesign. Adjusting spacing and incorporating a collapsable sidebar that could move out of the way provided more space. Snowcrash had some inconsistent visual hierarchy, especially around header & paragraph text sizes.

Some elements lacked visual cues to inform users that more information could be seen by scrolling. Additionally, Snowcrash had various cluttered views with a lot of information and action links that could be tucked away and accessed only when needed. I wanted to create an action menu (we call it the dots-menu) that could be used for any resource in virtually any view. I wanted this to have a specific look so that users would be able to recognize that there is something more they can do when they see this menu – like adding, editing, moving, and so on.

I embarked on this re-design journey knowing that I wanted to change the overall layout of the app but not completely re-design the individual partials that are rendered within the layout’s different views. I decided it would be best to work on those as the respective features got updated or other features got added.

Using my design tool of choice, Adobe Xd, I started on the main sidebar and the collapse/expand functionality. I designed this so that the user would expand the sidebar and once they navigated by clicking the links in the sidebar or clicked off the sidebar, it would collapse out of the way. With the sidebar opened, the rest of the view became faded out to bring attention to the floating sidebar. This came with subtle animations for the sidebar width transition, navigation link position, as well as opacity transitions for the node tree and sidebar header. At this point, I also added the new-to-Tylium Dashboard link, so users could easily navigate back to the initial view they are greeted with when they opened the project.

New sidebar style

Next, I moved on to the top navbar. In Snowcrash it was becoming a bit full and offered very limited space for long project names as well as new nav items. It was also visually connected to the sidebar giving the illusion of a smaller workspace for everything else in the project. I wanted to completely separate the navbar from the sidebar so I moved away from using the edition color as the navbar’s background color. In order to save some space, I changed the less-used nav links to round buttons with icons to reduce the total width they took up. I also re-designed the way the search button expanded and behaved to match the new round nav buttons.

Comparison of the old navbar (top) vs the new navbar (bottom)

I worked on the sidebar and navbar while looking at the project dashboard, so naturally, I moved on to the main dashboard area next. I wanted to keep the panels the dashboard had in Snowcrash but with an updated look. Again, I didn’t want to completely re-design any of the partials but I did update things along the way so they would be more cohesive with the new layout. The page heading and the panel headings had to become more distinguishable for one another so I increased the size of the page headers to ensure they wouldn’t be lost with panel headers. I also noticed there was inconsistency with borders and dividers, both in terms of colors and usage. I ensured all borders and dividing lines got the same color and that they were used consistently regardless of the view for a better visual presentation. The panels got a subtle border with rounded corners along with matching underlines for the panel headers. Some other components that got a refresh were the list of issues and the list of recent activities. 

For better user experience, I wanted the sidebar and navbar to always be visible regardless of the height and width of the view. This meant that only the view content would be scrollable. In order to keep a visual consistency throughout the layout, I used the changes I made to the dashboard to set the tone for all the other views.

Sidebar and navbar with locked position

At this point, I had a decent base for all views in the app but one major component that still needed work. Many of the views utilize a secondary sidebar that lists view-specific collections of items like, attachment uploads and import options. In design, we want the secondary sidebar to flow nicely with the main sidebar. I achieved this flow by making the secondary sidebar background color the same as the main sidebar active item background color. This would give the active sidebar item and the secondary sidebar a visual connection. The views that use a secondary-sidebar needed to match the rest of the app by having the view content sections neatly presented in panels. This meant that sections like Comments, Subscriptions, and so on got their own panel.

After all the design was completed it was time to dive into the code and translate the mockups to an actual working layout. Before I could do any of the fun stuff I had to first do the Bootstrap 2 to Bootstrap 4 migration. This proved to be quite tedious and required every single view file to be touched and restructured the Bootstrap 4 way. All the rows, columns, modals, panels/cards, and more, all had to be revised. Additionally, any JavaScript files using Bootstrap 2 classes had to be updated with Bootstrap 4 classes to maintain functionality. Finally, moving on to CSS files, I realized that over time as new features were added to Snowcrash, more CSS was added but as features were revised or updated, the no-longer-needed CSS was not removed. This resulted in a good amount of unused CSS lingering in the codebase. Furthermore, the custom CSS on top of 3rd party stylesheets resulted in some messy CSS that could have been significantly reduced to achieve the same result. I found many instances of over-specified properties on child elements and re-defined properties that were already defined elsewhere for the same elements. I put off cleaning up the CSS until I had the new Tylium layout in place. I figured some of the CSS could be re-used since the design of the partials rendered in the layout would not significantly change.

With the Bootstrap migration completed and out of the way, I was able to start coding the layout changes I’d designed in Adobe Xd. I implemented the design in roughly the same order as I designed it. I started with the sidebar and navbar, then moved to the main content areas of all views without a secondary-sidebar. I added the panel changes to each section of the views and adjusted things like header styles and font-sizes while utilized SASS variables for easy switching of colors between CE and Pro editions. 

Example of Tylium view without a secondary sidebar

Last but not least, I worked on the secondary sidebar and adjusted all the view files that utilized this sidebar and updated panel styles, panel headers, page headers, etc . While coding the secondary-sidebar I quickly realized that it could be taller than the view content itself depending on the collection of items rendered within it. This would cause the view content to be unnecessarily scrollable. To solve this, I locked the secondary sidebar height to match the height of the browser window and made it scroll independently of the main view content. This would also be a more natural behavior in situations where both the secondary sidebar and view content have enough height that they both need to scroll vertically. 

Another challenge I ran into was caused by a bug where the Bootstrap 4 modals appeared under the modal backdrop rendering all modals useless. After many hours of digging through the code, scratching my head, and growing new strands of grey hair, I turned to StackOverflow. It turns out this is a known Bootstrap 4 issue and the best way to solve it is to render all modals as direct children of the <body> tag. This required a refactor of the way we rendered modals in views.

At this point, the layout had come together nicely and everything was working as expected. Any bugs and quirks that came up along the way were resolved. Just as I was feeling good about it, all kinds of specs in the test suite were failing. I dove into the specs and updated what I knew needed updating based on the layout changes and Bootstrap migration but I noticed I wasn’t getting consistent failures. Some specs would fail sometimes and those same specs would pass other times. I had our developers, Aaron and Brian, step in to take a look. After many hours of debugging and researching, they finally realized the problem had to do with the sidebar toggle animation. The test suite was expecting the sidebar to be opened instantly so it could continue to go through the testing steps but the milliseconds of animation caused the test suite to intermittently break causing failures at different points. Ultimately, the solution was to disable animations for the test suite and all was well.

The last piece of the puzzle was to clean up all that old CSS. I ended up restructuring the CSS using a modified version of the SMACSS methodology. While tediously combing through each stylesheet, I removed unused, redundant, and unnecessary CSS. I was able to further reduce the amount of CSS by improving specificity.

Fun fact: Implementing Tylium modified 290 files and reduced the app’s code by 1871 lines.

GitHub stats

Tylium was finally ready for release. Pleasantly, the new look was generally well-received and as more and more users started to use the updated version of Dradis, we started to get more constructive feedback. Both our internal team and our users realized that the auto-collapsing toolbar created a workflow issue in cases where users needed to frequently switch nodes or manually add many new nodes. I set out to fix this hindrance by eliminating the need to click the sidebar in order to create/navigate nodes. After discussing a few options with the team, the decision was made to have users toggle the sidebar manually. To enable users to keep working regardless of the state of the sidebar, I removed the overlay that faded out the rest of the view. This allowed users to chose if they would like to have the sidebar open or closed and we implemented some logic to remember the sidebar state so users wouldn’t have to toggle it each time they returned to a project. This also helped with seamless navigation between views.

Overall, the new layout improved the app by:

  • Increasing screen real-estate by 18-20%
  • Updating Bootstrap’s version from the historic 2.3.2 to a more current 4.3.1
  • Improving accessibility by updating the text colors to meet at least Level AA of WCAG 2.0 standards.
  • Providing users with an app that has a modern look and feel while also increasing their productivity

This entire endeavor started in Oct 2019 with very early rough sketches and spanned about 6 months until it was finally publicly released in March 2020. Huge thanks to the entire team for their help and input throughout the entire process. ✌️

Matt,
Designer.

New in Dradis Pro v3.8

Dradis Framework is a collaboration and reporting tool for information security teams to manage and deliver the results of security assessments, in less time and with less frustration than manual methods.

Per-Tool Permissions

Before Dradis Pro v3.8.0, Admins had access to everything and Authors had access to a subset of features. Now, you can give specific Author users permission to use the tools they need. And, you can give them just the level of access that they need.

Give each Author tool-specific permissions

Each Author can be given access to specific projects. And, for tools like the IssueLibrary, the Rules Engine, or premium tools like the Remediation Tracker, Authors can be given action-based permissions. Do you only want Author #1 to be able to Read IssueLibrary entries but not create, update, or destroy them? You can do that! Do you want Author #2 to have full control over the Rules Engine? You can do that too!

AffectedCount and AffectedList controls

We’ve had the Affected content control for a long time. The Affected control exports a de-duplicated list of comma-separated Nodes for a specific Issue. But, what about if you needed each de-duplicated Node on a new line or in a bullet list? Or, what if you need to count the number of affected Nodes for your Issue?

We’ve rolled out 2 new content controls: AffectedList and AffectedCount. As you can see in the before/after example below, the AffectedList will export the same data as the old Affected content control, just in a list format. And, the AffectedCount will output the number of unique Nodes that the Issue is associated with.

The AffectedList and AffectedCount content controls can be used in your Word report templates

Do you need help updating your report template to use these new content controls? Email our support team and we’d be happy to help!

Project List table

We’ve also updated the Projects page to help you find that one Project you’re looking for. Your most recent projects will appear at the top of the screen as always. But, at the bottom, there’s now a sortable and filterable table. Click the column headings to sort the table by that field. Click the 2 columns dropdown to display different fields. And, type in a keyword to filter the table and display a subset of Projects.

The Projects Page now contains a sortable and filterable table

Release Notes

  • Add all activity view
  • Give dynamic columns, sorting and filtering to project list table
  • New Per-Tool Permissions
    • Premier the new project permission panel for testers
    • Introduce permission management for Issue Library, Rules Engine, and Remediation Tracker
  • Remove inconsistent content blocks breadcrumb
  • Render markup inside table columns
  • Update top navigation link styles and collapsed menu
  • Upgraded gems: rack, sanitize, sassc
  • Bugs fixed:
    • Comments:
    • Removes the edit link while editing
    • Fixes lingering comment borders after deleting comments
    • Resolves broken OVA and DUP upgrades on VM’s running in ESXi
    • Prevent icon overlap of long headers in secondary sidebar
    • Fixes overflow of long unbroken table cell text
    • Prevent text overflow on to select areas
    • Word report generation no longer errors with extra document properties
  • Integration enhancements:
    • IssueLib: markup rendered in columns
  • Reporting enhancements:
    • Excel: add Tag column
    • Word
      • New AffectedCount content control
      • New AffectedList content control (one host per line)
      • Update exported tables to have 100% width by default

Not using Dradis Pro on your team?

New in Dradis Pro v3.7

Dradis Framework is a collaboration and reporting tool for information security teams to manage and deliver the results of security assessments, in less time and with less frustration than manual methods.

Formatting Toolbar

Formatting text is even easier now with the editor toolbar. The toolbar makes it simple to enter and format text in an issue, evidence, notes, comments, and methodologies without needing to use Textile markup. The live preview updates with your formatting changes as you work.

Form Editor

Manually create issues and evidence using the form view, rather than using Textile field names and details. Name the form field and add in details for each item and the live preview updates as you work on the side.

If your project has a predefined template, using that template will create those form fields ready to populate.

Prefer to work with Textile? The source view is still available so you have the best of both worlds.

Dots Menu

In order to make the most of the available screen space, some item options – including edit, delete, and subscribe – have been moved to a single “dots” menu. The dots menu is located to the top right of the item and includes the actions available for that item.

Methodology Improvements

Cards in methodologies no longer require a due date. This is helpful for cards that are templates or hold information that doesn’t need to be locked to a specific date.

If a card has moved from one list to another, the original card link will redirect you to the card at its current location. Previously the link to the card would be broken, leaving you to hunt around until you found it (or didn’t and gave up looking).

Making it easier to find the board you are looking for, you can click on a methodology in the project dashboard or the board name in the activity feed to go to that board.

Release Notes

  • Add author to evidence and notes views
  • Add dynamic columns, sorting and filtering to Projects list
  • Add team name link to project navbar
  • Adjust Uploads layout to provide more visibility to the output console
  • Allow renaming and deleting boards through their dots menu
  • Avoid browser pre-populating password fields when editing users
  • Card improvements:
    • Not require a mandatory due date
    • Redirect to new url if the card has changed lists
    • Show board name and link in the Activity Feed
  • Card, Evidence, Issue, and Note form data will not be lost even if the form is not saved
    • Clear the form when the “Cancel” link is clicked
    • Remove prompt to restore data and instead persist and restore any changes seamlessly
  • Comments
    • Add Textile markup
    • Not lose changes even if the comment is not saved
    • Update comments feed to show author’s name instead of email
  • Display note and evidence titles in breadcrumbs
  • Display the Dots-menu in all views
  • Editor improvements:
    • Formatting toolbar to help with markup
    • New form-view to edit each field individually
    • Side-by-side editor preview that auto-updates
  • Generate consistent URLs in emails
  • Increase the size of output console
  • Let Admins be added or removed after a project is created
  • Link to Methodology from project summary chart
  • Move resource action links to dots-menu in breadcrumbs
  • Persist the state of the navigation sidebar in projects while navigating across different views
  • Remove tag color from issue titles in issue summary
  • Update code element style
  • Use shared noscript partial
  • Use user model reference for activities instead of user email
  • Upgraded gems: puma, rack, rails, sass-rails
  • Bugs fixed:
    • Allow Authors to set project permissions on project creation again
    • Fix Board partial broken structure
    • Fix ItemsTable extra whitespace causing unnecessary vertical scrolling
    • Fix Long items_table dropdown menus not scrollable
    • Fix Long project names interfering with search bar expansion
    • Fix breadcrumbs in cards under node boards
    • Fix textile preview not showing on issues with very long text
    • Prevent repetitive prompt when images are pasted after navigating multiple views.
    • Prevent report ‘Download’ button becoming a disabled ‘Processing…’ button once clicked
    • Render Textile preview of issues with very long text
    • Render avatars in the activity feed
    • Set :author when creating Evidence from an Issue
    • Show active state of Sidebar items properly
    • Bug tracker items: #560, #634
  • Integration enhancements:
    • Issue Library: sortable columns
    • Nexpose: better cipher wrapping coverage
    • Nikto: support new nested format
  • Reporting enhancements:
    • Custom Properties are now updated on document open
    • HTML reports now use main app’s markup rendering
  • Security Fixes:
    • Medium: Authenticated persistent comments cross-site scripting
    • Low: Authenticated (admin) persistent methodology template cross-site scripting

Not using Dradis Pro on your team?

Security Assessment Process: The Problem With “Good Enough”

The Current Process

As a freelance security consultant, researcher, and software developer, you could say Robin Wood is someone who knows their way around the security assessment process. On his site DigiNinja, you can find more than 50 security-related projects he’s released to the community.

Several years ago, Robin’s workflow involved using a basic text editor to log his clients’ vulnerability issues. He would then use those notes to produce his final reports. He did not use a structured or dedicated system or software platform.

Robin tested primarily web applications. This meant that the issues he discovered were pretty diverse from project to project. This project diversity was the major reason Robin felt that standardization of his project management would be difficult to implement.

He did recognize that his process had shortcomings. For one thing, he was often “reinventing the wheel” – writing about vulnerabilities that were similar to ones he’d written about before. He didn’t have an organized way to compare issues and easily re-use that content.

But, by and large, Robin’s process was “good enough” – it worked for him and he was doing fine. Mainly he felt that it would be too difficult and time consuming for him to switch to a new way of doing things.

Security assessment process quote about Dradis Pro

Enter Dradis Pro

A few years ago, Robin found himself working with an InfoSec company that was using Dradis Pro for logging issues and creating reports. At first he didn’t believe that learning the new software was worth the trouble. At any rate, he did it because it was part of the company’s process.

After getting used to using Dradis, though, Robin realized that his speed and efficiency had increased substantially. He continued to use Dradis from that point onward, even when he left that company and went to work for himself.

As Robin put it, “The problem is that you think, ‘My process works as it is, so I don’t have the time to put more effort into it. I’ll just use what I have.’ Then you’ll improve something and find a better way of doing it, and think, ‘Why didn’t I do this six months ago? Why didn’t I do this a year ago?’”

We’ll look at some of the ways in which Dradis Pro has helped improve Robin’s workflow and his clients’ experiences with the security assessment process.

Greater Project Structure and Organization

Even though Robin’s clients and projects are diverse, Dradis Pro has allowed him to standardize his project management. Dradis gives him a consistent way to do everything associated with a project: use and update methodologies, organize an assessment, take notes, and include screenshots and other evidence.

“All my stuff is in a nice place where I know where it is, and it’s all recorded in a constant fashion. The organization is the same every time.”

Easier Report Creation

Dradis can be connected to a library of vulnerability descriptions. Robin connects Dradis to MediaWiki (free, open-source software) to create his own library of preferred descriptions that can be easily edited and reused as he sees fit.

“It makes such a big difference. In every test you do, you think, ‘I know I’ve written that one up before.’ And before, I’d have to dig through all the reports, going, ‘How did I write that up before? I know I did a good description of this at some point.’ With the issue library, I write a good description and I put it in the library and it’s always there for me. I don’t have to reinvent the wheel. It saves so much time and effort.”

The library is always growing and always improving.

“You don’t put in an issue and forget about it. It’s always getting better over time. Whenever I find something I don’t understand or think I can improve, I go back in and improve it and that goes back in the library. It might even be minor improvements, like the odd typo or spelling mistake. So even in small ways, the client is getting a win out of it.”

Dradis customized report

Easier Report Customization

Dradis helps Robin even for his clients whose findings and reports require customization. In fact, with Dradis you can have multiple types of templates for different types of jobs. Once you have all of your project data in one place, you can export it in a variety of formats, such as Word, Excel, and HTML.

“I don’t use the same template for everyone because everyone is not the same. But I don’t want to be rewriting the same thing over again, either. So I just go in, take what I’ve got, and edit it to be bespoke for that customer, and that goes in the report. Even for the more rare or obscure issues, I still have a template that I can start with, instead of redoing it.”

Long-Term Storage and Retrieval

Dradis allows encrypted storage of projects, which makes it easy to keep projects secure and to revisit past projects.

“I had a client get in touch yesterday. Their test took place six months ago and they had questions about it. I can easily pull the archive, decrypt it, and I have all the data for them. It’s just there, ready to go.”

Improved Client Perception

Additionally, Dradis Pro has been key in helping Robin organize his projects as well as his clients’ perceptions of his work when he does on-site assessments.

“A client can come and sit down beside me while I’m on a site, and I can walk through each issue with them. There’s a nice display on screen with a full list of issues. I can click on them, show them the descriptions, and there’s a graph that shows how many high, medium, and low risks. If you tried to do that with a basic text file, obviously that doesn’t look as good.”

Improved Client Results

Improved project organization doesn’t just help Robin; most importantly, it improves his clients’ results.

“My clients really do get value out of it. They are getting more detailed and more time-tested descriptions. This makes it easier for them to understand what’s going on and makes it easier for them to remediate issues.”

New Features and Updates

Regularly, Dradis Pro adds and updates features in response to customer feedback and ideas.

“There are new versions and new features coming out frequently. It’s nice to be able to offload a technical issue to someone else. Unsurprisingly, [the Dradis team is] responsive to requests for features.”

Check out our newest edition release. 

A Necessary Tool

Dradis Pro has proven to be an indispensable part of Robin’s workflow.
We asked Robin, considering the many strengths of Dradis Pro, why isn’t everyone in InfoSec using something like it?

“It can seem like a lot of effort to learn a new security assessment process. I think that might put some people off. But like I did, you start small and just slowly build up into it. And at each step, you realize that you’ve made a big jump up and improved your efficiency and quality. It’s definitely worth the effort.”

Try Dradis for 30 Days

We are confident that Dradis Pro will improve your InfoSec workflow as it did for Robin’s. Conversely, if you try Dradis Pro for 30 days and don’t believe you’ve gotten your money’s worth, just let us know and we’ll give you your money back. Check out our straightforward plans here.

Want to ask us a question about how Dradis Pro can help your project management and report creation? Reach out to us on our Contact Page.

New in Dradis Pro v3.6

Dradis Framework is a collaboration and reporting tool for information security teams to manage and deliver the results of security assessments, in less time and with less frustration than manual methods.

Hello, good looking.

screen showing the project summary in Dradis Tylium theme
Tylium is included with Dradis Pro v3.6 and CE 3.16

We’ve introduced a new project theme for Dradis. Tylium* is more than sprucing up the design with sleek lines and modern styles. It incorporates thoughtful details to improve your workflow and provides us greater flexibility to address your UI feedback moving forward.

This is a big visual change, but you won’t have to hunt for the Dradis items you rely on since they haven’t gone too far from the previous theme, Snowcrash. We’ve minimized the impact on your day-to-day use of Dradis by keeping the feel and flow of the app familiar. 

A comparison of two different project summary themes
Snowcrash vs Tylium

Tylium optimizes your workspace, keeping the purpose of each view in mind. It adds space where you need more real estate for updating findings and resizes or rearranges elements when you need to see the big picture. An example of this can be seen with the collapsible sidebar that adds roughly 20% more space and keeps all sections of the app quickly accessible, even adding a dashboard link to the project summary.

animation showing a navigation bar collapsing.
Now you see it, now you don’t!

As always, we’re eager to hear what you think. If you have feedback on Tylium drop a comment here, send it via email, or share it in Slack.

*It is SOP at Security Roots that we honor our nerdoms where we can. Snowcrash, the previous theme, is a nod to Neal Stephenson’s cyberpunk novel of the same name. Our love of Battlestar Galactica continues on with the new theme, paying homage to the powerful fuel source used in the series – Tylium.

Report Generation Errors

Everyone knows that validating your report before generating it will save you a headache tracking down problems with the report later. Now, the validator is more helpful by providing additional context to help locate the problematic evidence. While we are preventing headaches if your report has errors that are detected during generation the option to download it won’t be displayed.

Oooh, there’s the problem!

Release Notes

  • Update app to new Tylium layout
  • Add the ability for kits to update an instance’s Plugin Manager templates
  • Add revision history for cards
  • Bugs fixed:
    • Updated support beacon. Legacy support was dropped for older versions
    • Fix errors on content overwrite flash messages
    • Fail and redirect to login instead of raising an error when attempting to log in as a user that has been removed
    • When a report export is invalid and errors we disable the download button to prevent further errors
    • Fix the mail initializer not finding existing configuration settings from the db
    • Fix Cancel link path for the Note Edit page
    • Fix services_extras not being excluded from Excel exports
    • Fix Rule checking for non-existent fields
  • Integration enhancements:
    • CVSSv3 calculator provides access to all Temporal/Environmental fields
  • Reporting enhancements:
    • Add support for ellipsis
    • Better Evidence references on failed validations
  • REST/JSON API enhancements:
    • Add team (team id, team name, team_since) in the teams API endpoint
  • Security Fixes:
    • High: Authenticated author can no longer continue to make project changes and will be logged out after being disabled by an admin
    • Medium: Prevent admins from updating other user’s comments

New Dradis Integration: WPScan

WPScan logo

When the WPScan team approached us in late 2019 offering to create an integration for Dradis, we were excited to work together. What goes together better than a WordPress security scanning tool and an easy way to turn those findings into a customized report? Maybe chocolate and peanut butter, but the Dradis WPScan integration is much more likely to result in a more secure website.

A screenshot of Dradis showing Issues created by the WPScan integration
Time to update WordPress 😬

WordPress powers 35% of the Internet’s websites from hobby blogs to Fortune 50 companies. WordPress’ ease of use, well-established community, and extensive plugins offerings (55,457 as of this post) make it an attractive option for creating a presence online. Unfortunately, these same charms also make WordPress an easy and frequent target for attack. 

In 2011, while investigating his own blog’s security, Ryan Dewhurst created a script that combined testing for WordPress’ vulnerabilities into a single tool. This script, now WPScan, enumerates usernames, plugins, and themes, performs brute force password attacks, and identifies the version of WordPress on a target. 

WPScan contributors went on to create WPVulnDB to manage the ever-growing list of known WordPress vulnerabilities in an online database. When used together, WPScan and WPVulnDB API provide realtime detailed vulnerabilities and recommendations in your scan results.

This new Dradis WPScan integration makes it a snap for you to import the results of your WPScan directly to a Dradis Project. Each target maps to a node within your Dradis project, any vulnerabilities found in a plugin, theme, or setup become Dradis issues, and when evidence is available – like a list of enumerated usernames – it is pulled into Dradis as evidence.

Ready to get started with Dradis and WPScan?

The steps to add the Dradis WPScan integration to Dradis CE or Dradis Pro are similar for both editions.

  • Add or edit the Gemfile.plugins file. The file locations for each edition is listed below
    • Dradis CE: top-level Dradis CE directory
    • Dradis Pro: /opt/dradispro/dradispro/shared/addons/
      • This file should be symlinked to /opt/dradispro/dradispro/current/
  • Append gem 'dradis-wpscan', github: 'dradis/dradis-wpscan' to the file
  • Save Gemfile.plugins
  • $ bundle install
  • Restart Dradis
  • 🎉 All done!

If you run into any snags with the process, reach out on the community forums, the CE or Pro Slack workspaces, or directly to support.

TL/dr: Import WPScan findings into Dradis with the new Dradis WPScan integration

Year in Review – a future Dradis feature

How many Dradis projects did you create this year? How many Issues did you find? Which were the most commonly found Issues? What was the most common severity of the Issues that you found?

Credit for this script idea goes to Marc Ligthart. His teammate reached out via the support inbox to see if we could create a quick “Year in Review” script that would list out the following:

1. Count of Projects created this year
2. Total Critical/High/Medium/Low Issues (by Tag)
3. Top 10 most found Issues (by title)
4. Top 10 most found Critical/High/Medium Issues (by title)

Dradis year in review script output example
Example output from the year in review script

You can already head over to our scripting repo and check out the Year in Review script. To use it:

1. SCP the file you your instance (e.g. to the /tmp folder)

2. Run the following in the command line as “dradispro”:
$ cd /opt/dradispro/dradispro/current/
$ RAILS_ENV=production bundle exec rails runner /tmp/year_in_review.rb

The output will list out the yearly review for all of the projects present on your Dradis instance.

Now, for the fun part? We want your feedback. If you like this idea, you’ll like version 2.0 even better. We want to include this functionality as part of the existing Business Intelligence Dashboard within Dradis. But first, we want to hear from you. What else would you like to see in a summary view like this in the BI Dashboard? What other metrics would be helpful for your team or what isn’t particularly useful about the current output? Please email our support team directly with feedback! We’re excited to continue working with you in 2020 and get you some more valuable insights into your Dradis usage along the way.